Self-Made Martyr

The imagery was striking.  To fulfill a requirement for a senior performance art project, Emma Sulkowicz carried a small dorm-room mattress with her daily throughout her final year at Columbia University.  She titled her project “Carry That Weight,” as the mattress represented the emotional burden of having been raped, she claimed, on a similar mattress earlier during her time at Columbia.  The project succeeded marvelously.  Within a few weeks, it attracted mainstream media attention, and Columbia became the latest flash-point in American sexual politics.

The masochism of Emma’s project is what fascinated us.  Carrying the mattress demanded drastic lifestyle change.  It’d be inconvenient and exhausting. It’d cripple her social life.  She’d be readily identifiable in public at all times, and would invite criticism and ridicule.  The combined effect was of severe, deliberate suffering.  How did Emma know this exhibitionist masochism would succeed so magnificently in sharpening our focus on her cause?  What did she know about her audience – the American public – that suggested we’d be transfixed by such laughable self-flagellation?

The Passion of the Mattress Girl

The notion that suffering makes us better people is a moral assumption common to the three Abrahamic faiths.  In art and doctrine, it’s most obvious in Christianity.  Indeed, the suffering of Jesus on the cross at Golgotha is a key tenet of why Christians regard him as a savior.  The virgin birth, the miracles, and the resurrection are also important, but it was his suffering – his pain, his anguish, his humiliation – that Christians cite as the “payment” for Original Sin.  The supernatural events are evidence of divinity, but it was Christ’s suffering that made him the Messiah.

This Stunt is Performed By a Professional.

Modern Christians practice self-denial and penance in hopes of becoming more “Christ-like.”  In their opposition to physician-assisted suicide, fundamentalist Christians often portray the suffering of the terminally ill as “beautiful” and “inspirational” experiences that can serve as vehicles to salvation.  Even worship – especially in liturgical denominations – is an exercise in gentle masochism, with extended periods of kneeling, tedious chanting, and strict prohibitions against expressing boredom.

The voices of the faithful reciting those liturgies have become softer during the past half-century.  Leaders of major denominations plainly acknowledge declines in church membership and worship service attendance, as well as a corresponding rise in the average age of their congregations.  The severity of this trend varies geographically and demographically, with it being most pronounced among well-educated westerners living in wealthy urban areas.

Hey, Babe.

We can make a reasonably assume Ms. Sulkowicz and her classmates at Columbia are included in most of these demographic categories.  It would seem to follow that while receiving an elite education in our most cosmopolitan city, she would’ve been inoculated from damaging religious dogma.  However, as many ex-Christians have explained, it can take a lifetime to discard the religious residue that continues to inform our worldview.  Those value judgements continue to shape our behavior and relationships.  We see evidence of this pattern among atheists who continue to express disgust at homosexual love, or who believe women should remain content in subordinate roles.

Dig the Threads.

I suspect we can find the moral foundation of the Mattress Girl incident and others like it in a residual, post-Christian assumption that  suffering makes us better people.  We dismiss the Gospels as mythology, but allow religious assumptions to shape otherwise humanist moral judgements.  Emma knew the most reliable means of bringing attention to her cause was to present herself as a secular martyr, “carrying the weight” of society’s failure to protect women.  It was unnecessary to demonstrate her actual victimization at the hands of an aggressor.  The spectacle of suffering was the only critical aspect of her campaign.  Who caused the suffering – herself, the accused, university administration, or “society” – was largely immaterial.  The image of a thin, un-athletic young woman awkwardly  lugging furniture around an elite university established her as a martyr of social justice in the minds of her audience.

Ms. Sulkowicz has likely secured herself a legacy as the prototypical narcissistic, millennial social justice advocate.  The man she accused of rape has been exonerated, and has filed a civil lawsuit against Columbia University administration for facilitating Emma’s theatrics.  However, Sulcowicz’s behavior was consistent with that of many of her ideologically-motivated contemporaries.  We can examine similar high-profile campaigns or “projects,” but the behavior and the underlying values now permeate nearly all levels of discussion of social justice.

The Virtue of Victimhood assumes a person’s credibility is positively correlated with the severity of the oppression s/he experiences.  We assume that affliction confers upon us a type of moral capital.  That capital may be leveraged for credibility in discussions of social justice, even if our argument is flawed, incoherent, or self-serving.  In many areas of identity politics, not having suffered the relevant type of oppression – for example, having experienced racial discrimination – can wholly disqualify a person from serious participation in a conversation, even if their position is sympathetic to the oppressed group.

It’s difficult to overstate the destructive effect this dynamic has on our understanding of social justice.  Most notably, the Virtue of Victimhood provides an incentive for us to exaggerate or entirely fabricate experiences of suffering in order to see our perspectives taken seriously.  Documents filed in the lawsuit against Columbia supports the conclusion that Ms. Sulkowicz was not raped, and that her accusations were in part retribution for romantic disinterest.  It’s important to note that much of what this young lady wanted to accomplish was not actually contingent upon her being a victim of rape.  Her argument that campus sexual assault is a neglected issue, that universities should take a more aggressive role in its prevention, the prosecution of offenders, and the support of victims; remains valid in light of the knowledge that she likely fabricated the story.  She knew, however, that a story of actual sexual victimization coupled with the dramatic optics of self-inflicted pain and humiliation, were a nearly failsafe means by which to propel herself to national prominence as a social justice martyr.

The increased tolerance of flawed arguments is another byproduct of our acceptance of the Virtue of Victimhood.  We have learned to assess arguments based not upon their coherence, but rather upon the resume of claimed oppression presented by its advocate.  Suffering can give us unique perspectives on a questions of social justice. However, it does not release us from the responsibility of framing an argument supported by evidence available to our audience.  When we, as the audience, release an activist from this responsibility, we are inviting ourselves to be conned into supporting flawed and cynical arguments, supported by “evidence” we’re unable to observe or verify.  Our discussion of social justice becomes laced with confused and contradictory ideological dogma, and we make little progress in identifying practical remedies to real injustice.

Belief in the supernatural is only one way we manifest our capacity for unreason.  As we continue to shed the faith of our fathers, we must become more aware of the assumptions that support our new morality.  We must examine those assumptions and identify their origins in our psyche.  Failure to do so will leave us vulnerable to manipulation, to enforced blindness every bit as paralyzing as that possible through belief in the supernatural.

3 thoughts on “Martyr: Salvation Through Activism

  1. I don’t know the details of the ‘Mattress Girl’ case enough to speak on her specifically. Of course, it is obvious that rape needs to be handled differently around the world for both men and women.

    I think you have a point about our obsession with martyrdom coming from Christianity, at least in part. Other religions use the same storyline and, as you pointed out, it works in secular situations as well. I’m not convinced that wallowing in our pain is all bad though. As is said, pain demands to be felt. Ignoring it isn’t healthy, wallowing in it too long isn’t healthy, but acknowledging it and letting ourselves feel it for a while is necessary.

    There is a reason the martyr narrative works so well across humanity, we have all felt pain. Emotionally and/or physically debilitating pain is a fact of human existence. If you live long enough, you will feel it. Most people trudge through it as best they can. Some handle it remarkably well, but others can’t seem to get out of the hole it digs. Seeing someone carrying their cross or mattress or whatever is relatable because at one point or another, we’ve all felt that desperation. The ubiquity of Abrahamic religion has engrained this narrative on the zeitgeist, but the foundation of martyrdom is utterly human in my opinion.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. First: Many, many thanks for reading the post and taking the time to respond.

      And you’re absolutely right in noting that the experience of pain as a necessary part of the human experience. I’m not nearly familiar enough with non-Abrahamic religions to contrast the perception of suffering between Abrahamic and non-Abrahamic religions. I definitely agree with your point abut the universal appeal of the martyr, but I guess what I was trying to drive home is that in post-Abrahamic communities (…Sulkowicz herself is Jewish), we still see suffering not only as relatable, but as an experience that makes you a better person.

      It was tough – and in some places unavoidable – to write this without making significant assumptions/guesses about what’s going on in other people’s heads, which of course we can’t know with any certainty. That said, this is my best swing at identifying why we fall over ourselves to highlight our resumes of affliction.

      Again, I sincerely appreciate you taking the time to read and respond to what I wrote. Thank you.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thank you for taking the time to write it. I love a post that makes me think.

        I think pain does form the person we are/become, but the applicable situations are few and the time is great to turn a painful experience into an enriched person. Shifting the narrative away from pain=a better person would undoubtedly improve humanity’s mental health.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s